Skip to content


maj 4, 2010


Some weeks ago I was once again with a pleasure following a popular TV-show called ”Draknästet” similar in concept to the BBC Dragons’ Den where entrepreneurs get to pitch their ideas to five potential investors. It can be very inspiring to see people pitching their great ideas and how, if they manage to convince the investors to offer them a bid. Quite often money isn’t all they are after but also competence, qualifications and network. What surprised me watching the last show last week was their attitude towards a pitch combining commercial and charity idea. Henrik Zander and Karl Wijkmark, two young entrepreneurs from Gothenburg presented an idea of selling their of brand of water while investing a part of their profits into building water wells and providing clean water in Africa. Consumers are given the option to finance water projects by their usual purchase of water. I’m not saying that the business idea in itself was perfect; there were several parts unclear; like the detail on the amount of profits that were to invest to Africa. What bothered me most was attitude investors showed towards and idea that is school example of social entrepreneurship (with the correct execution off course). Douglas Roos stated that a mixture of charity, capitalism and help organisations makes him allergic, while Susanna Falkengren defined it as a ethical grey zone she would not whish to be associated with. In spite of initial optimism even Sven Hagströmer had no interest taking part in the water business.

I do understand in a way their doubts and second thoughts about partnering commercial ideas with charity, but that can be overcome by looking at it from another perspective: just as they mentioned traditional charity organisation are losing their trust by serving only themselves, furthermore only giving away resources and living on charity is by far not sustainable. Why should we not use well known business models we know work to solve bigger problems of society?? And once and for all stop using the term charity and instead invest in good ideas. Of course this is not possible without some crucial predispositions such as transparency and effective usage of resources and mostly good execution.

Once again I am not saying that presented “water idea” is something I would invest in right away, what I would like to point out is the attitude of people that have great power in our society. Risk capitalists, like the “dragons” in the show are very influential, sitting on valuable financial and social resources. I wish I would get the chance to have a workshop or an open debate about social entrepreneurship with them! Would definitely be an interesting and passionate discussion!

By: Vanja

2 kommentarer leave one →
  1. maj 12, 2010 11:06 f m

    Hi Vanja

    You seem to have forgotten that one of the dragons did invest in the project and that he agreed to so if the entrepreneurs changed their business base from a commercial company to a trust so that all of the earnings could go towards charitable purposes.

    In my opinion this post would be much more interesting and valid if it’s content reflected the whole picture rather than a rhetorically chosen distorsion of it.



  2. Vanja permalink
    maj 14, 2010 8:08 f m


    Thank you for your comments.
    Yes indeed one of the ”dragons” agreed to invest but only if they changed it into a trust and . Which is of course admiring. I could just describe and rewrite about the whole show and concept but for that everyone can just see the video I attached and formulate their own opinion about it.

    I choose to focus on a general climate that was to sense from the investors towards social entrepreneurship. Of course there was a positive outcome but thats my point exactly: they labelled them as ”charity” workers instead of seeing an opportunity and a chance for broadening the traditional concepts and solve a problem in a society with the help of traditional business tools.
    What I was trying to point out is that we still have a long way in front of us before social entrepreneurship will be seen as a credible and ethical right choice and that is exactly what I as a Young Investor strive for.


Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in: Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Ansluter till %s

%d bloggare gillar detta: